The Perception of the Head of Puskesmas in Pekanbaru City

Oct 13, 2025 by wbrum.org 136 views

Introduction

In 2002, the city of Pekanbaru was undergoing a significant transformation in improving the quality of health services. The role of health workers was crucial in this effort, but how did the Heads of Puskesmas in Pekanbaru City perceive the needs of education and training for these workers? This article aims to review the perception of the Heads of Puskesmas in Pekanbaru City regarding the educational needs and training of health workers under their leadership.

The Perception of the Head of Puskesmas in Pekanbaru City

The perception of the Head of Puskesmas in Pekanbaru City in 2002 revealed an urgent need to improve the competence and knowledge of health workers. They identified several deficiencies in terms of education and training that needed to be addressed. Firstly, the lack of specific and directed training programs according to the needs in the field was a major concern. Many training programs offered tended to be common and could not be directly applied in daily practice. Secondly, the limited access and opportunity for health workers to attend training was a significant issue. Factors such as costs, distance, and time were major inhibitors. Thirdly, the lack of support from the government in terms of financing and training facilities made it difficult for the Heads of Puskesmas to meet the education needs and training of health workers under their leadership.

The Real Conditions in the Field

This perception reflects the real conditions in the field, where health workers need specific guidance and knowledge to overcome the various health problems faced in the community. They require a relevant and practical training program that can be directly applied in the handling of patients. In addition, easy access and affordable costs are essential to improve the quality of health services in Pekanbaru City.

The Need for Government Intervention

This situation requires the government to take concrete steps in providing quality education and training programs for health workers. This can be achieved through various strategies, such as:

Increasing Access and Opportunity

Opening more training programs with affordable costs and easy-to-reach locations, both in cities and in the regions.
Providing incentives to health workers who take part in the training, both in the form of certificates, promotion, or salary increases.

Adjusting the Curriculum

Paying attention to specific needs in the field, so the training given is relevant to the health challenges faced in Pekanbaru City.

Improving the Quality and Relevance

Co-collaborating with Experienced Experts and Professionals to provide high-quality training.

Providing Incentives

Providing incentives to health workers who take part in the training, both in the form of certificates, promotion, or salary increases.

Conclusion

By improving the quality of education and training of health workers, the government can guarantee the creation of better and professional health services in Pekanbaru City. This will have a positive impact on improving the welfare of the community and the achievement of national health development goals.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

The government should increase access and opportunity for health workers to attend training programs.
The curriculum of training programs should be adjusted to meet the specific needs of health workers in Pekanbaru City.
The quality and relevance of training programs should be improved through co-collaboration with Experienced Experts and Professionals.
Incentives should be provided to health workers who take part in the training, both in the form of certificates, promotion, or salary increases.

By implementing these recommendations, the government can improve the quality of health services in Pekanbaru City and achieve the national health development goals.

Introduction

The perception of the Head of Puskesmas in Pekanbaru City in 2002 regarding the educational needs and training of health workers under their leadership is a crucial aspect of improving the quality of health services in the city. In this article, we will address some of the frequently asked questions (FAQs) related to this topic.

Q: What were the main concerns of the Head of Puskesmas in Pekanbaru City regarding the educational needs and training of health workers?

A: The main concerns of the Head of Puskesmas in Pekanbaru City were the lack of specific and directed training programs, limited access and opportunity for health workers to attend training, and the lack of support from the government in terms of financing and training facilities.

Q: What were the real conditions in the field that required specific guidance and knowledge from health workers?

A: The real conditions in the field were the various health problems faced in the community, which required health workers to have specific guidance and knowledge to overcome these challenges.

Q: What strategies can the government implement to improve the quality of education and training of health workers?

A: The government can implement various strategies, such as increasing access and opportunity for health workers to attend training programs, adjusting the curriculum to meet the specific needs of health workers, improving the quality and relevance of training programs, and providing incentives to health workers who take part in the training.

Q: What are the benefits of improving the quality of education and training of health workers?

A: The benefits of improving the quality of education and training of health workers include the creation of better and professional health services, improved welfare of the community, and achievement of national health development goals.

Q: What are the recommendations for improving the quality of education and training of health workers?

A: The recommendations for improving the quality of education and training of health workers include increasing access and opportunity for health workers to attend training programs, adjusting the curriculum to meet the specific needs of health workers, improving the quality and relevance of training programs, and providing incentives to health workers who take part in the training.

Q: How can the government ensure the implementation of these recommendations?

A: The government can ensure the implementation of these recommendations by allocating sufficient funds for training programs, providing support for health workers to attend training, and monitoring the progress of training programs.

Conclusion

The perception of the Head of Puskesmas in Pekanbaru City in 2002 regarding the educational needs and training of health workers under their leadership is a crucial aspect of improving the quality of health services in the city. By addressing the FAQs related to this topic, we can better understand the challenges faced by health workers and the strategies that can be implemented to improve their education and training.

Recommendations for Future Research

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations for future research are made:

Conduct a study on the current status of education and training of health workers in Pekanbaru City.
Identify the specific needs of health workers in Pekanbaru City and develop training programs that meet these needs.
Evaluate the effectiveness of training programs in improving the quality of health services in Pekanbaru City.
Develop a plan for the implementation of training programs in Pekanbaru City.

By conducting future research on these topics, we can gain a better understanding of the challenges faced by health workers and the strategies that can be implemented to improve their education and training.