The Medan City Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2011

Oct 13, 2025 by wbrum.org 81 views

Introduction

The reduction of Rural and Urban Land and Building Taxes (PBB-P2) in Medan City is a complex issue that has been regulated in various laws and regulations. However, the lack of legal certainty regarding the amount of land and building tax reduction for individual taxpayers in the city of Medan has led to legal uncertainty and disputes. This study aims to provide a juridical analysis of the reduction of PBB-P2 to individual taxpayers in Medan City, with a focus on the principle of justice and the need for clear and transparent guidelines.

Background

The reduction of PBB-P2 in Medan City is regulated in Article 21 Paragraph (2) of the Medan City Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2011. This regulation was followed by the issuance of Medan Mayor Regulation No. 73 of 2011 concerning UN Technical Guidelines, which refers to Article 31 of the Mayor Regulation Number 73 of 2011. However, the provision has led to legal uncertainty related to the reduction given to individual taxpayers.

The Main Problem

The main problem in this study is the lack of legal certainty regarding the amount of land and building tax reduction for individual taxpayers in the city of Medan. In addition, it is necessary to observe the principle of justice in the provisions of reducing PBB-P2 for individual taxpayers in the area. During this time, legal efforts made by taxpayers to get a reduction in PBB-P2 are often not fulfilled.

Theoretical Framework

This research is normative juridical, with descriptive specifications that utilize secondary data. Data is collected through literature studies and analyzed qualitatively. The theoretical framework of this study is based on the principle of justice in reducing PBB-P2, which is regulated in the PDRD Law in Article 95 paragraph (4) letter a. This article states that reduction, relief, and tax exemption can be given under certain conditions.

The Principle of Justice in Reducing PBB-P2

The principle of justice in reducing PBB-P2 is regulated in the PDRD Law in Article 95 paragraph (4) letter a. This article states that reduction, relief, and tax exemption can be given under certain conditions. In addition, Article 107 paragraph (2) letter e PDRD gives authority to regional heads to reduce tax determination based on tax payment considerations by taxpayers or certain conditions of tax objects.

The Medan City Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2011

The Medan City Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2011 regulates the reduction of PBB-P2 in Article 25 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2). This article regulates tax reduction based on the ability of taxpayers. However, the implementation in the field is often not in accordance with the expectations of taxpayers.

The Provisions that Require Taxpayers to Fulfill Tax Obligations

Another obstacle is the provisions that require taxpayers to fulfill tax obligations before submitting legal efforts related to tax disputes. The imperative nature of this provision makes the position of the taxpayer more difficult, because often they have to wait for an unclear decision regarding the reduction they should have received.

Conclusion

In conclusion, to create legal certainty and justice in reducing land and rural and urban buildings in the city of Medan, it is necessary to evaluate and improve existing regulations. By providing clear and transparent guidelines, it is hoped that justice can be created for individual taxpayers and provide legal certainty expected by the community.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

The Medan City Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2011 should be revised to provide clear and transparent guidelines for the reduction of PBB-P2.
The Medan Mayor Regulation No. 73 of 2011 should be revised to provide clear guidelines for the reduction of PBB-P2.
The PDRD Law should be revised to provide clear guidelines for the principle of justice in reducing PBB-P2.
The provisions that require taxpayers to fulfill tax obligations before submitting legal efforts related to tax disputes should be revised to provide a more just and fair process for taxpayers.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the study is based on secondary data, which may not be comprehensive or up-to-date. Secondly, the study only focuses on the reduction of PBB-P2 in Medan City and does not consider other cities or regions. Finally, the study only provides a juridical analysis of the reduction of PBB-P2 and does not consider other aspects, such as economic or social impacts.

Future Research Directions

Q: What is the main problem in this study?

A: The main problem in this study is the lack of legal certainty regarding the amount of land and building tax reduction for individual taxpayers in the city of Medan.

Q: What is the principle of justice in reducing PBB-P2?

A: The principle of justice in reducing PBB-P2 is regulated in the PDRD Law in Article 95 paragraph (4) letter a, which states that reduction, relief, and tax exemption can be given under certain conditions.

Q: What is the Medan City Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2011?

A: The Medan City Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2011 regulates the reduction of PBB-P2 in Article 25 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), which regulates tax reduction based on the ability of taxpayers.

Q: What are the provisions that require taxpayers to fulfill tax obligations?

A: The provisions that require taxpayers to fulfill tax obligations before submitting legal efforts related to tax disputes are regulated in the Medan City Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2011.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: The recommendations of this study are:

The Medan City Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2011 should be revised to provide clear and transparent guidelines for the reduction of PBB-P2.
The Medan Mayor Regulation No. 73 of 2011 should be revised to provide clear guidelines for the reduction of PBB-P2.
The PDRD Law should be revised to provide clear guidelines for the principle of justice in reducing PBB-P2.
The provisions that require taxpayers to fulfill tax obligations before submitting legal efforts related to tax disputes should be revised to provide a more just and fair process for taxpayers.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study are:

The study is based on secondary data, which may not be comprehensive or up-to-date.
The study only focuses on the reduction of PBB-P2 in Medan City and does not consider other cities or regions.
The study only provides a juridical analysis of the reduction of PBB-P2 and does not consider other aspects, such as economic or social impacts.

Q: What are the future research directions of this study?

A: The future research directions of this study are:

Further research should be conducted to explore the economic and social impacts of the reduction of PBB-P2.
Further research should be conducted to explore the implementation of the reduction of PBB-P2 in other cities or regions.
Further research should be conducted to explore the development of a more just and fair process for taxpayers in reducing PBB-P2.

Q: What is the conclusion of this study?

A: In conclusion, to create legal certainty and justice in reducing land and rural and urban buildings in the city of Medan, it is necessary to evaluate and improve existing regulations. By providing clear and transparent guidelines, it is hoped that justice can be created for individual taxpayers and provide legal certainty expected by the community.