Strengthening Coordination

Oct 13, 2025 by wbrum.org 95 views

Community Response to Poverty Reduction Program in Urban (P2KP) in Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village, Tanjung Morawa District, Deli Serdang Regency

Introduction

Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village in Tanjung Morawa District, Deli Serdang Regency, has been the location of research on the impact of poverty reduction programs in urban areas (P2KP) on the welfare of the community. This study aims to understand the community's response to this program and identify its effectiveness in improving welfare. The research focuses on the community's response to P2KP, including their expectations, perceptions, and experiences with the program.

Background

Poverty reduction programs in urban areas (P2KP) are designed to improve the welfare of communities in urban areas. The program aims to provide assistance to low-income families and individuals, enabling them to improve their economic and social status. However, the implementation of P2KP in Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village has been met with challenges, including lack of transparency, competency limitations, and coordination gaps.

Methodology

This descriptive research involves 100 family heads as samples, chosen by proportional sampling techniques. Data was collected through literature studies and field studies, including observation and interviews. Data analysis uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods.

Results

The results of this study indicate that the community's response to P2KP in Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village is still varied. Although this program has the potential to improve welfare, its implementation still needs to be improved in order to achieve its goals effectively.

Program Effectiveness

Although P2KP is expected to help poverty alleviation, its implementation in Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village is still not optimal. Several problems in the implementation of the program have been identified, including:

*** Lack of Transparency ***

The community complained about the lack of transparency in the management of P2KP funds. This lack of transparency has led to mistrust among the community, making it difficult for them to participate in the program.

*** Competency Limitations ***

Village facilitators are considered less competent in organizing the community and developing the economy and the environment. This limitation has hindered the effectiveness of the program, as the facilitators are unable to provide the necessary support to the community.

*** Coordination Gap ***

The relationship between program implementers and the Regional Government (Pemda) of Deli Serdang Regency is less harmonious. This is caused by the vision and mission of the local government that is different in alleviating poverty, namely through the Deli Serdang Building Movement.

Community Expectations

The community still hopes for P2KP to help alleviate poverty, but hopes the program will be evaluated and strictly monitored. The community expects the program to be more transparent and accountable, and for the facilitators to be more competent in managing the program.

Additional Analysis and Explanation

The results of this study indicate that P2KP, despite having a noble goal, still faces a number of obstacles in achieving its goals. Limited resources, lack of coordination between related parties, and lack of community understanding of the program are several factors that need to be considered.

Suggestions and Recommendations

To improve the effectiveness of P2KP in Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village, the following suggestions and recommendations are made:

*** Increasing Transparency ***

Increasing transparency in the management of P2KP funds is very important to build public trust. The program implementers should provide regular updates on the use of funds and the progress of the program.

*** Competency Increasing ***

Training and capacity building of kelurahan facilitators needs to be done to improve their ability to manage programs and empower the community.

*** Strengthening Coordination ***

There needs to be a strong synergy between program implementers and the Deli Serdang Regency Government to ensure program harmony and implementation effectiveness.

*** Socialization and Education ***

The community needs to be clearly informed of the P2KP mechanism and how they can take advantage of the program.

Conclusion

This study shows that the community's response to P2KP in Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village is still varied. Although this program has the potential to improve welfare, its implementation still needs to be improved in order to achieve its goals effectively. The suggestions and recommendations made in this study aim to improve the effectiveness of P2KP and ensure that the program is more responsive to the needs of the community.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

The sample size is limited to 100 family heads, which may not be representative of the entire community.
The study only focuses on the community's response to P2KP, and does not consider other factors that may influence the program's effectiveness.
The study is based on a qualitative approach, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the program's effectiveness.

Future Research Directions

Future research should aim to:

Increase the sample size to ensure that the results are more representative of the community.
Consider other factors that may influence the program's effectiveness, such as the role of local government and the impact of external factors.
Use a mixed-methods approach to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the program's effectiveness.

References

[List of references cited in the study]

Appendices

[Appendices, including additional data and information]

Note: The content of this article is based on the provided markdown text. The article has been rewritten to make it more readable and to include additional information, such as the methodology, results, and limitations of the study. The article also includes suggestions and recommendations for improving the effectiveness of P2KP in Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village.
Q&A: Community Response to Poverty Reduction Program in Urban (P2KP) in Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village, Tanjung Morawa District, Deli Serdang Regency

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the purpose of the Poverty Reduction Program in Urban (P2KP) in Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village?

A: The purpose of the P2KP program is to improve the welfare of communities in urban areas by providing assistance to low-income families and individuals, enabling them to improve their economic and social status.

Q: What are the challenges faced by the P2KP program in Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village?

A: The P2KP program in Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village faces several challenges, including lack of transparency, competency limitations, and coordination gaps. These challenges hinder the effectiveness of the program and make it difficult for the community to participate.

Q: What is the role of the village facilitators in the P2KP program?

A: The village facilitators play a crucial role in the P2KP program, as they are responsible for organizing the community and developing the economy and the environment. However, the facilitators are considered less competent in managing the program, which hinders its effectiveness.

Q: How can the P2KP program be improved to better serve the community?

A: To improve the effectiveness of the P2KP program, several suggestions and recommendations can be made, including increasing transparency in the management of funds, increasing the competency of village facilitators, strengthening coordination between program implementers and the Regional Government, and providing socialization and education to the community.

Q: What are the expectations of the community regarding the P2KP program?

A: The community still hopes for the P2KP program to help alleviate poverty, but hopes the program will be evaluated and strictly monitored. The community expects the program to be more transparent and accountable, and for the facilitators to be more competent in managing the program.

Q: What are the limitations of the study?

A: The study has several limitations, including a limited sample size, a focus on the community's response to P2KP, and a qualitative approach that may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the program's effectiveness.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should aim to increase the sample size, consider other factors that may influence the program's effectiveness, and use a mixed-methods approach to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the program's effectiveness.

Q: What are the implications of the study for policy and practice?

A: The study has several implications for policy and practice, including the need for increased transparency and accountability in the management of funds, the need for competency building of village facilitators, and the need for stronger coordination between program implementers and the Regional Government.

Additional Questions and Answers

Q: What is the role of the Regional Government in the P2KP program?

A: The Regional Government plays a crucial role in the P2KP program, as they are responsible for providing support and resources to the program implementers. However, the relationship between the program implementers and the Regional Government is less harmonious, which hinders the effectiveness of the program.

Q: How can the community participate in the P2KP program?

A: The community can participate in the P2KP program by attending meetings and workshops, providing feedback and suggestions, and taking advantage of the program's services and benefits.

Q: What are the benefits of the P2KP program for the community?

A: The P2KP program provides several benefits to the community, including improved economic and social status, increased access to education and healthcare, and enhanced community development.

Q: What are the challenges faced by the community in participating in the P2KP program?

A: The community faces several challenges in participating in the P2KP program, including lack of awareness and understanding of the program, lack of access to information and resources, and lack of trust in the program implementers.

Conclusion

The Q&A article provides additional information and answers to frequently asked questions about the community response to the Poverty Reduction Program in Urban (P2KP) in Pekan Tanjung Morawa Village, Tanjung Morawa District, Deli Serdang Regency. The article highlights the challenges faced by the program, the role of the village facilitators, and the expectations of the community. It also provides suggestions and recommendations for improving the effectiveness of the program and enhancing community participation.