Maintenance of access to the Belawan Industrial Estate in Medan

Oct 13, 2025 by wbrum.org 82 views

Studies in Determining Road Development Priorities in North Sumatra Province using Fuzzy-Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Introduction

Choosing a priority road construction program is a complex challenge in decision making, given the numerous criteria that need to be considered. The Fuzzy-Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is an effective approach to handling it. This study applied Fuzzy-AHP to determine the priority of road construction in North Sumatra Province. The results show that Maintenance of Jalan Marelan (intersection of battles-BTS. Deli Serdang) in Medan is the first priority, followed by Maintenance of access to the Belawan Industrial Estate in Medan, and finally, the development of Tanah Abang Road in Deli Serdang Regency is the third priority.

The Need for Fuzzy-AHP

The fuzzy-AHP method has an advantage in dealing with complex problems that involve criteria that are difficult to measure with certainty. This method is able to combine the subjective assessment of experts with objective data through the hierarchical process. The fuzzy-AHP method is particularly useful in situations where there is a lack of clear and precise data, and where the decision-making process involves multiple stakeholders with different opinions and priorities.

Advantages of Fuzzy-AHP

The fuzzy-AHP method has several advantages that make it an attractive approach for decision making. Some of the key advantages of fuzzy-AHP include:

Able to handle uncertain criteria: Fuzzy-AHP is able to process uncertain or qualitative data, which is often the case in real-world decision-making situations.
Combining subjective and objective assessments: This method considers the assessment of experts and quantitative data simultaneously, which provides a more comprehensive and balanced view of the situation.
Facilitate decision making: Fuzzy-AHP simplifies the complex decision-making process by producing clear priority ratings, which can help decision makers to make more informed and effective decisions.

Priority Analysis of Road Development

The results of Fuzzy-AHP analysis show that Marelan Jalan is the first priority because it has significant importance in supporting connectivity and accessibility in Medan. This road is a vital path that connects the city center with industrial and port areas. The maintenance of this road is crucial for the smooth operation of logistics and economic activities in the region.

Access road in the Belawan Industrial Estate is also an important priority, as it is essential for the efficient operation of logistics and economic activities in the region. The maintenance of this road is critical for the growth and development of the industrial estate.

Meanwhile, Jalan Tanah Abang has the potential to increase accessibility and economic growth in the region, so that it becomes the third priority. The development of this road is expected to have a positive impact on the local economy and improve the quality of life for residents in the region.

Conclusion

The application of fuzzy-AHP in determining the priority of road construction in North Sumatra provides a comprehensive and objective solution. This method helps decision makers to determine proper and effective development priorities. The results of this analysis can be the basis for the government in planning and allocating a budget for road construction in North Sumatra, so as to increase connectivity and encourage economic growth in the region.

Recommendations

Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Prioritize the maintenance of Marelan Jalan: The maintenance of this road is crucial for the smooth operation of logistics and economic activities in the region.
Develop access road in the Belawan Industrial Estate: The development of this road is essential for the efficient operation of logistics and economic activities in the region.
Develop Jalan Tanah Abang: The development of this road is expected to have a positive impact on the local economy and improve the quality of life for residents in the region.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations that should be noted. Some of the key limitations include:

Limited data: The study was based on limited data, which may not be representative of the entire region.
Subjective assessment: The study relied on subjective assessment of experts, which may be biased.
Complexity of the problem: The problem of determining road development priorities is complex and multifaceted, and may require a more comprehensive and nuanced approach.

Future Research Directions

Future research should focus on addressing the limitations of this study and exploring new approaches to determining road development priorities. Some potential research directions include:

Developing a more comprehensive and nuanced approach: Future research should aim to develop a more comprehensive and nuanced approach to determining road development priorities, taking into account multiple stakeholders and perspectives.
Using more advanced methods: Future research should explore the use of more advanced methods, such as machine learning and artificial intelligence, to determine road development priorities.
Addressing the limitations of fuzzy-AHP: Future research should aim to address the limitations of fuzzy-AHP, such as the subjective assessment of experts and the limited data used in this study.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Fuzzy-Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Determining Road Development Priorities

Q: What is Fuzzy-Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)?

A: Fuzzy-AHP is a decision-making method that combines the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with fuzzy logic. It is used to handle complex decision-making problems that involve multiple criteria and uncertain or qualitative data.

Q: What are the advantages of using Fuzzy-AHP in determining road development priorities?

A: The advantages of using Fuzzy-AHP in determining road development priorities include:

Able to handle uncertain criteria: Fuzzy-AHP is able to process uncertain or qualitative data, which is often the case in real-world decision-making situations.
Combining subjective and objective assessments: This method considers the assessment of experts and quantitative data simultaneously, which provides a more comprehensive and balanced view of the situation.
Facilitate decision making: Fuzzy-AHP simplifies the complex decision-making process by producing clear priority ratings, which can help decision makers to make more informed and effective decisions.

Q: How does Fuzzy-AHP work?

A: Fuzzy-AHP works by:

Defining the problem: The problem is defined and the criteria for decision-making are identified.
Establishing the hierarchy: The hierarchy of the problem is established, with the goal at the top and the criteria at the bottom.
Assigning weights: The weights of the criteria are assigned based on their importance.
Evaluating the options: The options are evaluated based on the criteria and weights.
Determining the priority: The priority of each option is determined based on the evaluation.

Q: What are the limitations of Fuzzy-AHP?

A: The limitations of Fuzzy-AHP include:

Limited data: Fuzzy-AHP requires a significant amount of data to be effective, which may not be available in all situations.
Subjective assessment: Fuzzy-AHP relies on subjective assessment of experts, which may be biased.
Complexity of the problem: Fuzzy-AHP is a complex method that requires a high level of expertise to use effectively.

Q: Can Fuzzy-AHP be used in other areas besides road development?

A: Yes, Fuzzy-AHP can be used in other areas besides road development, such as:

Infrastructure development: Fuzzy-AHP can be used to determine the priority of infrastructure development projects, such as bridges, tunnels, and public transportation systems.
Urban planning: Fuzzy-AHP can be used to determine the priority of urban planning projects, such as the development of new neighborhoods, parks, and public spaces.
Environmental management: Fuzzy-AHP can be used to determine the priority of environmental management projects, such as the development of new water treatment plants, waste management systems, and conservation areas.

Q: How can Fuzzy-AHP be implemented in practice?

A: Fuzzy-AHP can be implemented in practice by:

Establishing a decision-making team: A team of experts should be established to make decisions using Fuzzy-AHP.
Defining the problem: The problem should be defined and the criteria for decision-making should be identified.
Establishing the hierarchy: The hierarchy of the problem should be established, with the goal at the top and the criteria at the bottom.
Assigning weights: The weights of the criteria should be assigned based on their importance.
Evaluating the options: The options should be evaluated based on the criteria and weights.
Determining the priority: The priority of each option should be determined based on the evaluation.

Q: What are the benefits of using Fuzzy-AHP in determining road development priorities?

A: The benefits of using Fuzzy-AHP in determining road development priorities include:

Improved decision-making: Fuzzy-AHP provides a more comprehensive and balanced view of the situation, which can lead to improved decision-making.
Increased efficiency: Fuzzy-AHP simplifies the complex decision-making process, which can lead to increased efficiency.
Better allocation of resources: Fuzzy-AHP helps to allocate resources more effectively, which can lead to better outcomes.

Q: What are the challenges of using Fuzzy-AHP in determining road development priorities?

A: The challenges of using Fuzzy-AHP in determining road development priorities include:

Limited data: Fuzzy-AHP requires a significant amount of data to be effective, which may not be available in all situations.
Subjective assessment: Fuzzy-AHP relies on subjective assessment of experts, which may be biased.
Complexity of the problem: Fuzzy-AHP is a complex method that requires a high level of expertise to use effectively.