Legal Materials for Land Consolidation that are not aspirational

Oct 13, 2025 by wbrum.org 94 views

Critical Study of the Implementation of Consolidation of Urban Land in North Sumatra: Exploring aspects of Regional Autonomy and Community Welfare

Introduction

The implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra has been a topic of interest for many years. This study aims to provide a critical analysis of the implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra, focusing on the aspects of regional autonomy and community welfare. The study explores the process and results of the implementation of land consolidation, whether it is in accordance with the aspirations of the participants and provides optimal benefits, especially in improving their welfare. This study also examines the factors and problems that inhibit the achievement of soil consolidation goals.

Background

Urban land consolidation is a process of reorganizing and redeveloping urban land to improve its use and value. In North Sumatra, urban land consolidation has been implemented in several cities, including Medan City, Deli Serdang Regency, Langkat Regency, and Dairi Regency. The implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra is expected to provide optimal benefits for the participants, especially in improving their standard of living. However, the process and results of the implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra are still not in accordance with the aspirations of the participants.

Methodology

This study uses a qualitative juridical approach with multi-entry or multi-disciplined methods. That is, analysis is not only based on the legal norms of land consolidation, but also considers non-legal aspects, such as politics, economy, and philosophy. The data used includes primary and secondary data. Primary data obtained from respondents and informants through field research, while secondary data obtained from literature studies, including primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials.

Research Design

This study involved participants in urban land consolidation in Medan City, Deli Serdang Regency, Langkat Regency, and Dairi Regency, which was selected through purposive sampling techniques. The study aims to explore the process and results of the implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra, whether it is in accordance with the aspirations of the participants and provides optimal benefits, especially in improving their welfare.

Results

The results of this study showed several important points:

First, the process and results of the implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra are still not in accordance with the aspirations of the participants.

Second, the implementation of urban land consolidation has not been able to produce optimal benefits for participants in improving their welfare. This is caused by several factors, including:

Legal Materials for Land Consolidation that are not aspirational: The existing rules have not fully accommodated the needs and aspirations of the participants.

Dysfunction of coordination between related agencies: less optimal coordination between related agencies results in the process of implementing soil consolidation to be ineffective.

Limited professional human resources: Lack of professional human resources in the field of land consolidation can hamper the process and results of the implementation of soil consolidation.

Legal culture of the apparatus and participants of the land consolidation that is not yet good: Lack of understanding and compliance with the law is an obstacle to the success of the implementation of land consolidation.

Third, this research provides recommendations for the legal regulation of urban land consolidation in accordance with the perspective of regional autonomy. This policy aims to provide optimal benefits for the participants and improve their standard of living.

Discussion

The results of this study highlight the importance of considering the aspects of regional autonomy and community welfare in the implementation of urban land consolidation. The existing rules and regulations for land consolidation in North Sumatra have not fully accommodated the needs and aspirations of the participants. The dysfunction of coordination between related agencies and the limited professional human resources in the field of land consolidation are also obstacles to the success of the implementation of land consolidation.

Conclusion

This study provides a critical analysis of the implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra, focusing on the aspects of regional autonomy and community welfare. The study highlights the importance of considering the needs and aspirations of the participants in the implementation of urban land consolidation. The study also provides recommendations for the legal regulation of urban land consolidation in accordance with the perspective of regional autonomy.

Recommendations

This research provides several recommendations for the legal regulation of urban land consolidation in accordance with the perspective of regional autonomy. The policy should prioritize a populist approach and accommodate the aspirations of local communities. The principles of happiness and improvement of welfare for participants must be the main focus, both in the perspective of regional autonomy and the national legal system.

Future Research Directions

This study provides a critical analysis of the implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra. Future research directions should focus on exploring the effectiveness of the implementation of urban land consolidation in other regions in Indonesia. The study should also explore the impact of the implementation of urban land consolidation on the welfare of the participants.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations. The study only focuses on the implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra, and the results may not be generalizable to other regions in Indonesia. The study also relies on primary and secondary data, which may not be comprehensive.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides a critical analysis of the implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra, focusing on the aspects of regional autonomy and community welfare. The study highlights the importance of considering the needs and aspirations of the participants in the implementation of urban land consolidation. The study also provides recommendations for the legal regulation of urban land consolidation in accordance with the perspective of regional autonomy.

References

[1] [Author's Name]. (Year). Title of the Book. Publisher.
[2] [Author's Name]. (Year). Title of the Article. Title of the Journal, Volume(Issue), pp-pp.
[3] [Author's Name]. (Year). Title of the Thesis. University Name.

Appendices

[Appendix 1: List of Respondents]
[Appendix 2: List of Informants]
[Appendix 3: List of Literature Studies]
[Appendix 4: List of Data Analysis]
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Critical Study of the Implementation of Consolidation of Urban Land in North Sumatra

Q: What is the main objective of this study?

A: The main objective of this study is to provide a critical analysis of the implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra, focusing on the aspects of regional autonomy and community welfare.

Q: What are the key findings of this study?

A: The key findings of this study include:

The process and results of the implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra are still not in accordance with the aspirations of the participants.
The implementation of urban land consolidation has not been able to produce optimal benefits for participants in improving their welfare.
The existing rules and regulations for land consolidation in North Sumatra have not fully accommodated the needs and aspirations of the participants.
The dysfunction of coordination between related agencies and the limited professional human resources in the field of land consolidation are obstacles to the success of the implementation of land consolidation.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: The recommendations of this study include:

Prioritizing a populist approach and accommodating the aspirations of local communities in the implementation of urban land consolidation.
Focusing on the principles of happiness and improvement of welfare for participants, both in the perspective of regional autonomy and the national legal system.
Improving the coordination between related agencies and providing professional human resources in the field of land consolidation.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study include:

The study only focuses on the implementation of urban land consolidation in North Sumatra, and the results may not be generalizable to other regions in Indonesia.
The study relies on primary and secondary data, which may not be comprehensive.

Q: What are the implications of this study?

A: The implications of this study include:

The need for policymakers to consider the aspects of regional autonomy and community welfare in the implementation of urban land consolidation.
The importance of improving the coordination between related agencies and providing professional human resources in the field of land consolidation.
The need for further research on the effectiveness of the implementation of urban land consolidation in other regions in Indonesia.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: The future research directions include:

Exploring the effectiveness of the implementation of urban land consolidation in other regions in Indonesia.
Investigating the impact of the implementation of urban land consolidation on the welfare of the participants.
Developing a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to urban land consolidation that takes into account the needs and aspirations of all stakeholders.

Q: What are the policy implications of this study?

A: The policy implications of this study include:

The need for policymakers to prioritize a populist approach and accommodate the aspirations of local communities in the implementation of urban land consolidation.
The importance of focusing on the principles of happiness and improvement of welfare for participants, both in the perspective of regional autonomy and the national legal system.
The need for policymakers to improve the coordination between related agencies and provide professional human resources in the field of land consolidation.

Q: What are the practical implications of this study?

A: The practical implications of this study include:

The need for practitioners to consider the aspects of regional autonomy and community welfare in the implementation of urban land consolidation.
The importance of improving the coordination between related agencies and providing professional human resources in the field of land consolidation.
The need for practitioners to develop a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to urban land consolidation that takes into account the needs and aspirations of all stakeholders.

Q: What are the theoretical implications of this study?

A: The theoretical implications of this study include:

The need to develop a more comprehensive and inclusive theory of urban land consolidation that takes into account the aspects of regional autonomy and community welfare.
The importance of considering the principles of happiness and improvement of welfare for participants in the implementation of urban land consolidation.
The need to develop a more nuanced understanding of the relationships between urban land consolidation, regional autonomy, and community welfare.