Interaction between Farmers

Oct 13, 2025 by wbrum.org 84 views

Application of Agricultural Extension Communication Methods to Farmers Groups in Aceh Tamiang Regency

Introduction

Agricultural extension services play a crucial role in promoting agricultural development and improving the livelihoods of farmers. In Aceh Tamiang Regency, the Gemah Rifah I farmer group in Jamur Labu Village, Rantau District, has been receiving support from field extension officers (PPL) to enhance their agricultural productivity and income. This study aims to identify the application of agricultural extension communication methods used by PPL in the Gemah Rifah I farmer group. By using a qualitative approach in a case study, researchers conducted interviews and observations of informants consisting of PPL, Chairman of the Gemah Rifah I Farmers Group, as well as members of the farmer group.

Methodology

This study was conducted during the April to June 2016 period. The data collected includes a combination of primary and secondary data, which is then analyzed through triangulation to ensure the accuracy of the results of interviews and related observations. The qualitative approach used in this study allows for a deeper understanding of the application of communication methods used by PPL in the Gemah Rifah I farmer group.

Dominant Communication Method

In the application of communication methods, PPL uses a group approach through organizing routine meetings. This method is considered more effective, because the information conveyed can be well received by farmers in a directed, regular, and sustainable manner. Through an effective communication process in group meetings, there are several forms of communication that occurs, namely:

One-way Communication

In this case, PPL conveys information directly to farmers. This makes it easy to deliver the material needed in an efficient time. One-way communication is an essential aspect of agricultural extension services, as it allows PPL to provide farmers with accurate and timely information on agricultural practices, market trends, and new technologies.

Interaction between Farmers

In this meeting, farmers also exchanged information and experiences about agricultural practices they had lived. This provides an opportunity for farmers to learn from one another. Interaction between farmers is a critical component of agricultural extension services, as it fosters a sense of community and cooperation among farmers. By sharing their experiences and knowledge, farmers can learn from each other's successes and failures, and develop new skills and strategies to improve their agricultural productivity.

Transaction Communication

Farmers share experience and techniques in farming, which is useful for increasing group productivity as a whole. Transaction communication is a two-way process that involves the exchange of information, ideas, and experiences between farmers and PPL. This type of communication is essential in agricultural extension services, as it allows farmers to share their knowledge and experiences with PPL, and receive feedback and guidance on how to improve their agricultural practices.

The Effectiveness of Group Methods in Agribusiness Development

Another important finding from this study shows that in farmer groups that have a higher class, counseling methods that use group approaches with routine meetings have proven to be very effective in supporting the development of agribusiness business. This reflects the importance of collaboration in farmer groups, which allows improving the quality of information and skills needed to improve agricultural output. The effectiveness of group methods in agribusiness development is a critical aspect of agricultural extension services, as it enables farmers to work together to achieve common goals and improve their agricultural productivity.

Conclusion

Overall, the application of communication methods carried out by PPL in the Gemah Rifah I farmer group has shown positive results, especially in the context of agribusiness development and increasing farmers' capacity. The application of this method not only improves communication between PPL and farmers, but also strengthens interaction between farmers, thus creating a more conducive environment to learn and share experiences in the world of agriculture. This study highlights the importance of effective communication in agricultural extension services, and the need for PPL to use group approaches and routine meetings to support the development of agribusiness business.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

PPL should continue to use group approaches and routine meetings to support the development of agribusiness business. This method has proven to be effective in improving communication between PPL and farmers, and strengthening interaction between farmers.
PPL should provide training and capacity-building programs for farmers to improve their agricultural knowledge and skills. This will enable farmers to make informed decisions about their agricultural practices, and improve their agricultural productivity.
PPL should establish partnerships with other stakeholders, such as input suppliers, financial institutions, and market operators, to support the development of agribusiness business. This will enable farmers to access the resources and services they need to improve their agricultural productivity and income.

By implementing these recommendations, PPL can continue to support the development of agribusiness business in Aceh Tamiang Regency, and improve the livelihoods of farmers in the region.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Application of Agricultural Extension Communication Methods to Farmers Groups in Aceh Tamiang Regency

Q: What is the main objective of this study?

A: The main objective of this study is to identify the application of agricultural extension communication methods used by field extension officers (PPL) in the Gemah Rifah I farmer group in Jamur Labu Village, Rantau District, Aceh Tamiang Regency.

Q: What is the significance of this study?

A: This study is significant because it highlights the importance of effective communication in agricultural extension services, and the need for PPL to use group approaches and routine meetings to support the development of agribusiness business.

Q: What are the dominant communication methods used by PPL in the Gemah Rifah I farmer group?

A: The dominant communication methods used by PPL in the Gemah Rifah I farmer group are group approaches through organizing routine meetings, one-way communication, interaction between farmers, and transaction communication.

Q: What is the effectiveness of group methods in agribusiness development?

A: The study found that in farmer groups that have a higher class, counseling methods that use group approaches with routine meetings have proven to be very effective in supporting the development of agribusiness business.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: The recommendations of this study are:

PPL should continue to use group approaches and routine meetings to support the development of agribusiness business.
PPL should provide training and capacity-building programs for farmers to improve their agricultural knowledge and skills.
PPL should establish partnerships with other stakeholders, such as input suppliers, financial institutions, and market operators, to support the development of agribusiness business.

Q: What are the implications of this study for agricultural extension services?

A: The implications of this study for agricultural extension services are that PPL should use group approaches and routine meetings to support the development of agribusiness business, and provide training and capacity-building programs for farmers to improve their agricultural knowledge and skills.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study are that it was conducted in a single case study, and the findings may not be generalizable to other contexts.

Q: What are the future research directions based on this study?

A: The future research directions based on this study are to conduct a larger-scale study to investigate the effectiveness of group methods in agribusiness development, and to explore the role of other stakeholders in supporting the development of agribusiness business.

Q: What are the policy implications of this study?

A: The policy implications of this study are that governments and other stakeholders should support the development of agricultural extension services, and provide resources and funding for PPL to use group approaches and routine meetings to support the development of agribusiness business.

Q: What are the practical implications of this study?

A: The practical implications of this study are that PPL should use group approaches and routine meetings to support the development of agribusiness business, and provide training and capacity-building programs for farmers to improve their agricultural knowledge and skills.