Factors Influencing Accreditation Value and Pharmaceutical Practice Criteria

Oct 13, 2025 by wbrum.org 94 views

Introduction

Pharmaceutical practice is a crucial component in health services carried out by pharmacists. However, in the city of Medan, this practice has not been fully implemented in accordance with applicable standards. The aim of this study is to evaluate the conditions of community pharmaceutical practices in the area and formulate coaching strategies to ensure that pharmaceutical practices are in accordance with established standards.

Methodology

This study was conducted using a descriptive cross-sectional method involving a questionnaire from June to September 2020. A total of 105 pharmacists at a pharmacy selected by cluster random sampling were involved in the study. The questionnaire was designed to gather information on the accreditation status of pharmacies, the category of pharmaceutical practices, and various factors that may influence the accreditation value and the criteria for pharmaceutical practices.

Results

The results of the study showed that community pharmaceutical practices in Medan had not run according to the expected standards. Of the 105 pharmacies studied, the percentage of pharmacy accreditation is as follows:

Accreditation A: 67.6%
Accreditation B: 21.0%
Accreditation C: 9.5%
Not Accredited: 1.9%

Related to the category of pharmaceutical practices, only 20% are included in the very good category, while 48% are in the good category, 21% sufficient categories, 9% of the categories are lacking, and 2% in the lower standard criteria. This shows that there are still many rooms for improvement in pharmaceutical services in the community.

Factors Influencing Accreditation Value and Pharmaceutical Practice Criteria

Some factors that influence the accreditation value and the criteria for pharmaceutical practices after being tested statistically include:

Other work for pharmacists: This factor has a significant relationship with the accreditation value and the criteria for pharmaceutical practices.
Presence of pharmacists at pharmacies: The presence of pharmacists at pharmacies has a significant relationship with the accreditation value and the criteria for pharmaceutical practices.
Pharmacist graduation year: The year of graduation of pharmacists has a significant relationship with the accreditation value and the criteria for pharmaceutical practices.
Pharmacy status: The status of pharmacies has a significant relationship with the accreditation value and the criteria for pharmaceutical practices.

Implications for Related Parties

The results of this study have important implications for related parties, such as the Health Office and Professional Organizations. It is essential for these parties to formulate an effective coaching strategy to revitalize pharmaceutical practices and meet the established criteria. Improving the quality of services in pharmacies, training for pharmacists, arrangement of pharmacy management systems, and tighter supervision are several steps that can be taken to achieve this goal.

Conclusion

With the joint efforts of all parties, it is hoped that the practice of community pharmacy in Medan can meet predetermined pharmaceutical standards and provide optimal benefits for the community. This will not only improve the quality of health services, but will also increase public confidence in the pharmacist profession.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Health Office: The Health Office should formulate an effective coaching strategy to revitalize pharmaceutical practices and meet the established criteria.
Professional Organizations: Professional Organizations should provide training for pharmacists and arrange pharmacy management systems to improve the quality of services in pharmacies.
Pharmacists: Pharmacists should be aware of the importance of meeting the established criteria for pharmaceutical practices and take steps to improve their services.
Community: The community should be aware of the importance of pharmaceutical services and support the efforts of pharmacists to improve their services.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

Sample size: The sample size of this study was limited to 105 pharmacists.
Sampling method: The sampling method used in this study was cluster random sampling.
Questionnaire design: The questionnaire used in this study was designed to gather information on the accreditation status of pharmacies and the category of pharmaceutical practices.

Future Research Directions

Future research should focus on:

Evaluating the effectiveness of coaching strategies: Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of coaching strategies in improving pharmaceutical practices.
Identifying factors influencing pharmaceutical practices: Future research should identify factors influencing pharmaceutical practices and develop strategies to address these factors.
Improving pharmacy management systems: Future research should focus on improving pharmacy management systems to improve the quality of services in pharmacies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study aimed to evaluate the conditions of community pharmaceutical practices in Medan and formulate coaching strategies to ensure that pharmaceutical practices are in accordance with established standards. The results of this study showed that community pharmaceutical practices in Medan had not run according to the expected standards. The study identified several factors that influence the accreditation value and the criteria for pharmaceutical practices. The implications of this study are important for related parties, such as the Health Office and Professional Organizations, to formulate an effective coaching strategy to revitalize pharmaceutical practices and meet the established criteria.

Q1: What is the main objective of this study?

A1: The main objective of this study is to evaluate the conditions of community pharmaceutical practices in Medan and formulate coaching strategies to ensure that pharmaceutical practices are in accordance with established standards.

Q2: What is the significance of this study?

A2: This study is significant because it aims to improve the quality of pharmaceutical services in the community, which is essential for providing optimal benefits for the community. It also aims to increase public confidence in the pharmacist profession.

Q3: What are the factors that influence the accreditation value and the criteria for pharmaceutical practices?

A3: The factors that influence the accreditation value and the criteria for pharmaceutical practices include other work for pharmacists, the presence of pharmacists at pharmacies, pharmacist graduation year, and pharmacy status.

Q4: What are the implications of this study for related parties?

A4: The implications of this study are important for related parties, such as the Health Office and Professional Organizations, to formulate an effective coaching strategy to revitalize pharmaceutical practices and meet the established criteria.

Q5: What are the recommendations of this study?

A5: The recommendations of this study include:

Health Office: The Health Office should formulate an effective coaching strategy to revitalize pharmaceutical practices and meet the established criteria.
Professional Organizations: Professional Organizations should provide training for pharmacists and arrange pharmacy management systems to improve the quality of services in pharmacies.
Pharmacists: Pharmacists should be aware of the importance of meeting the established criteria for pharmaceutical practices and take steps to improve their services.
Community: The community should be aware of the importance of pharmaceutical services and support the efforts of pharmacists to improve their services.

Q6: What are the limitations of this study?

A6: The limitations of this study include:

Sample size: The sample size of this study was limited to 105 pharmacists.
Sampling method: The sampling method used in this study was cluster random sampling.
Questionnaire design: The questionnaire used in this study was designed to gather information on the accreditation status of pharmacies and the category of pharmaceutical practices.

Q7: What are the future research directions?

A7: Future research should focus on:

Evaluating the effectiveness of coaching strategies: Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of coaching strategies in improving pharmaceutical practices.
Identifying factors influencing pharmaceutical practices: Future research should identify factors influencing pharmaceutical practices and develop strategies to address these factors.
Improving pharmacy management systems: Future research should focus on improving pharmacy management systems to improve the quality of services in pharmacies.

Q8: What are the benefits of this study?

A8: The benefits of this study include:

Improved quality of pharmaceutical services: This study aims to improve the quality of pharmaceutical services in the community.
Increased public confidence: This study aims to increase public confidence in the pharmacist profession.
Better health outcomes: This study aims to improve health outcomes by providing optimal benefits for the community.

Q9: Who are the target audience of this study?

A9: The target audience of this study include:

Health Office: The Health Office is a key stakeholder in this study, as they are responsible for formulating policies and strategies to improve pharmaceutical practices.
Professional Organizations: Professional Organizations are also key stakeholders in this study, as they are responsible for providing training and support to pharmacists.
Pharmacists: Pharmacists are also key stakeholders in this study, as they are responsible for providing pharmaceutical services to the community.
Community: The community is also a key stakeholder in this study, as they are the beneficiaries of pharmaceutical services.

Q10: What are the next steps after this study?

A10: The next steps after this study include:

Implementation of coaching strategies: The Health Office and Professional Organizations should implement coaching strategies to revitalize pharmaceutical practices and meet the established criteria.
Evaluation of coaching strategies: The effectiveness of coaching strategies should be evaluated to determine their impact on pharmaceutical practices.
Continued research: Future research should focus on identifying factors influencing pharmaceutical practices and developing strategies to address these factors.