Excellence of Profile Matching

Oct 13, 2025 by wbrum.org 20 views

Comparison of the Naive Bayes Method and Profile Matching in the Decision Support System to Determine the Basketball Team's Core Players at SMK Telkom Sandhy Putra Medan

Introduction

The world of basketball has experienced rapid growth and development over the years, with an increasing number of competitions and matches at various levels, from school to national levels. This has led to a significant challenge for basketball coaches in forming the best possible core team, as they often struggle to meet the team's needs. In this context, a decision support system emerges as a solution to help coaches determine the right players for the core team, based on the desired criteria.

The Need for a Decision Support System

In basketball, the ability of individual players to contribute significantly to the team's overall performance is crucial. Coaches need to make informed decisions about which players to select for the core team, taking into account various factors such as dribbling ability, shooting, passing, and stamina. A decision support system can provide valuable assistance to coaches in this regard, helping them to make more effective decisions.

The Naive Bayes Method and Profile Matching

The decision support system employed in this study utilizes two main algorithms: the Naive Bayes method and Profile Matching. The Naive Bayes method is used for classifying data into specific categories, enabling the identification of patterns that can be used to predict the position of new players. This allows coaches to make more informed decisions about player placement. On the other hand, the Profile Matching algorithm assumes that there are ideal predictor variables that prospective players should possess, rather than just meeting minimum standards.

Method Analysis

In this study, the criteria used to evaluate players are the ability to dribble, shoot, pass, and possess stamina. These criteria are highly relevant in basketball games, where individual contributions significantly impact the team's overall performance.

The results of the study showed that the Profile Matching method outperformed the Naive Bayes method in terms of accuracy and process speed. The Profile Matching method achieved higher accuracy, making it more effective in assisting coaches in decision-making. Additionally, the speed of the Profile Matching algorithm process, which reached 6,5588 milliseconds, was significantly faster than the Naive Bayes method, which took 81,5971 milliseconds.

Excellence of Profile Matching

The advantage of Profile Matching lies in its ability to provide a more comprehensive approach in assessing the potential of players based on ideal criteria that have been set. With this system, coaches can choose players who not only meet minimum requirements but also those who best suit the team's vision and mission.

This is particularly important in competitive environments such as basketball matches, where every decision taken can impact the final result. Therefore, the use of Profile Matching methods in the decision support system provides significant added value for coaches and the basketball team as a whole.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the application of a decision support system based on the Naive Bayes algorithm and Profile Matching can help basketball coaches determine the more effective arrangement of players. Although the two methods have their respective advantages, this research confirms that the Profile Matching method is superior in terms of accuracy and speed, making it a better choice to be used at SMK Telkom Sandhy Putra Medan. By utilizing the right technology and methods, coaches can improve the quality of the team and performance on the ground.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Implementation of Profile Matching: The Profile Matching method should be implemented in the decision support system to assist coaches in determining the core team.
Training and Development: Coaches and players should undergo training and development programs to enhance their skills and knowledge in using the decision support system.
Continuous Evaluation: The decision support system should be continuously evaluated and improved to ensure that it remains effective in assisting coaches in decision-making.

Future Research Directions

Future research should focus on the following areas:

Development of New Algorithms: New algorithms should be developed to improve the accuracy and speed of the decision support system.
Integration with Other Systems: The decision support system should be integrated with other systems, such as player tracking and analytics, to provide a more comprehensive view of player performance.
User-Centered Design: The decision support system should be designed with the user in mind, taking into account the needs and preferences of coaches and players.

By implementing the recommendations and exploring future research directions, the decision support system can be further improved to provide more effective assistance to coaches in determining the core team.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Naive Bayes Method and Profile Matching in the Decision Support System

Q: What is the Naive Bayes method and how does it work?

A: The Naive Bayes method is a type of machine learning algorithm that is used for classifying data into specific categories. It works by assuming that the features of the data are independent of each other, and then using Bayes' theorem to calculate the probability of each class given the features.

Q: What is Profile Matching and how does it differ from the Naive Bayes method?

A: Profile Matching is a decision-making mechanism that assumes that there are ideal predictor variables that prospective players should possess, rather than just meeting minimum standards. It differs from the Naive Bayes method in that it takes into account a more comprehensive set of criteria, including the player's ability to dribble, shoot, pass, and possess stamina.

Q: What are the advantages of using Profile Matching in the decision support system?

A: The advantages of using Profile Matching in the decision support system include its ability to provide a more comprehensive approach in assessing the potential of players, its higher accuracy, and its faster processing speed.

Q: How does the decision support system assist coaches in determining the core team?

A: The decision support system assists coaches in determining the core team by providing a comprehensive analysis of player performance, including their ability to dribble, shoot, pass, and possess stamina. It also helps coaches to identify the ideal predictor variables that prospective players should possess.

Q: Can the decision support system be used in other sports besides basketball?

A: Yes, the decision support system can be used in other sports besides basketball. The system is designed to be flexible and adaptable to different sports and scenarios, making it a valuable tool for coaches and teams in various sports.

Q: How can the decision support system be improved?

A: The decision support system can be improved by developing new algorithms, integrating it with other systems, and designing it with the user in mind. Additionally, the system can be improved by incorporating more data and features, such as player tracking and analytics.

Q: What are the potential limitations of the decision support system?

A: The potential limitations of the decision support system include its reliance on data quality and availability, its sensitivity to algorithmic biases, and its potential for over-reliance on technology.

Q: How can coaches and teams implement the decision support system in their daily operations?

A: Coaches and teams can implement the decision support system in their daily operations by following a series of steps, including:

Data collection: Collecting data on player performance, including their ability to dribble, shoot, pass, and possess stamina.
System setup: Setting up the decision support system and configuring it to meet the team's specific needs.
Data analysis: Analyzing the data using the decision support system to identify the ideal predictor variables and player performance metrics.
Decision-making: Using the insights and recommendations provided by the decision support system to make informed decisions about player selection and team composition.

By following these steps, coaches and teams can effectively implement the decision support system in their daily operations and gain a competitive edge in their respective sports.